Supreme Court Abandons Presumption of Regularity in Trump v. Cook

The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. Cook breaks with the long-standing presumption of regularity, a doctrine granting deference to official government actions. This shift signals a more skeptical judicial posture toward executive and administrative conduct, potentially opening the door to broader challenges of government decisions. The full implications for administrative law and executive power remain uncertain as lower courts adapt to the new standard.